Championship Return? Mike Budenholzer Emerges as Surprise Contender for Bucks Coaching Role.
In a stunning and unforeseen twist, the Milwaukee Bucks sent shockwaves through the NBA by parting ways with head coach Adrian Griffin after just 43 games into the season. Griffin, who took the reins in the offseason, guided the team to an impressive 30-13 record, establishing them as a formidable force in the Eastern Conference, second only to the Boston Celtics.
Amid the chaos of Griffin’s sudden departure, speculations erupted when false reports circulated about the Bucks swiftly appointing Doc Rivers as his replacement. Contrary to these rumors, Doc Rivers remains a fixture on ESPN’s broadcast team, though sources suggest he is still under consideration for the vacant coaching role.
The repercussions of such a significant move have ignited debates within the basketball community. Here are five compelling reasons advocating caution against the Milwaukee Bucks appointing Doc Rivers as their new head coach.
1. An internal hire would be more beneficial: With Joe Prunty stepping in as the interim head coach, a case is made for internal stability. Prunty, a seasoned NBA assistant coach since 1996, has been part of illustrious coaching staffs with Gregg Popovich and Avery Johnson. Familiarity with the system and players might give him the edge, fostering a smoother transition than an external hire like Doc Rivers.