In a scathing revelation, Julianna Peña exposes Amanda Nunes‘ retirement as a strategic move for publicity, challenging the authenticity of the former champion’s departure from the UFC.
Julianna Peña has consistently doubted Amanda Nunes’ retirement claims and, despite Nunes hanging up her gloves after a victorious bout against Irene Aldana last June, Peña remains unconvinced. Nunes, a two-division UFC champion, attended UFC 297, sparking speculation about a potential comeback as she expressed feeling like a champion.
The controversy deepened when Peña, known for her vocal demeanor, openly booed Nunes during her retirement speech. Speaking on “The MMA Hour,” Peña expressed frustration, emphasizing the missed opportunity for a historic trilogy fight, labeling Nunes’ retirement as a “joke.”
View this post on Instagram
Peña’s skepticism proved justified when Nunes hinted at a return during an interview with Megan Olivi. Peña, referencing her pre-retirement boos, declared it as another instance of her foresight. Criticism from Nunes’ fans followed, but Peña stands firm in her position, questioning the legitimacy of Nunes’ retirement given her apparent willingness to return.
The narrative took a dramatic turn when Peña, who secured a monumental upset victory over Nunes at UFC 269, witnessed Nunes reclaiming the title at UFC 277. Eager to settle the score, Peña now sees the entire saga as a strategic move by Nunes for attention, rather than a genuine retirement.
Peña openly admits her attempts to entice Nunes back into the octagon, emphasizing the positive impact on business. She contends that Nunes’ retirement was merely a publicity stunt and applauds the potential for a lucrative rematch.
As Peña shifts her focus to newly crowned champion Raquel Pennington, with whom she shares history from “The Ultimate Fighter,” the unresolved tension with Nunes remains a central theme. The anticipation for a rematch, fueled by Peña’s strong assertions, adds layers to the ongoing drama in the women’s bantamweight division.
In this unfolding saga, Julianna Peña emerges not just as a fighter, but as a vocal critic unmasking the intricacies of the fight game, challenging the authenticity of fighters’ decisions, and keeping the spotlight on the drama that fuels the sport.
KAIRA’S VIEW
In a compelling editorial perspective on the ongoing drama between Julianna Peña and Amanda Nunes, one can’t help but empathize with Peña’s frustration and skepticism. Peña’s candid expression on “The MMA Hour” reflects the human side of a fighter deeply invested in her career and the sport’s narrative. The emotion behind Peña’s boos during Nunes’ retirement speech stems from a genuine desire for a historic trilogy fight, emphasizing the missed opportunity for the biggest women’s fight in history. The narrative takes a personal turn as Peña, labeled ‘Mystic Peña’ for her foresight, faces criticism from Nunes’ fans. Amidst the drama, Peña’s assertion that Nunes’ retirement was a mere ploy for attention adds a layer of humanity to the narrative, painting the fight game as not just a competition but a complex interplay of personal aspirations and public perception. As Peña shifts focus to Raquel Pennington, the emotional investment and eagerness to settle the score underscore the intricate and human side of the fighters involved, making this saga a captivating chapter in women’s MMA.
